At 16:21 29/04/2002 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: >Jos, I think you're right that it's a misunderstabnding... > >I was responding to "We build a rule mechanism", which I understood to be >a means to define rules *in RDF* (similar to log:implies in N3), and which >I think would be a unacceptably substantial change to RDF at this >stage. If this means simply that we define some extra closure rules, then >I withdraw that particular objection. That's what I meant. Sorry for the confusing language. BrianReceived on Monday, 29 April 2002 12:02:47 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:38 EDT