W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: doc reviews

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:03:26 +0100
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <13200.1019819006@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com said:
> would like to see added approval of
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/Manifest.rdf

Look OK for test001, test002 combinations

> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/Manifest.rdf
Look OK test001-004.  conjunction looks ok.

> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/Manifest.rdf
> -> after correction that this is just 1 test i.e. test001.nt |- test002.nt
>    which we approved, didn't we ?? (even with afterwards pinging DanC/PatH)

Look OK for test001.rdf->test001.nt and test002->test002.nt
There is no test001->test002 in the manifest

Dave
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 07:03:29 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:37 EDT