W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 22 Apr 2002 11:24:24 -0500
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Lynn Andrea Stein <las@olin.edu>
Message-Id: <1019492665.4817.468.camel@dirk>
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 11:28, Graham Klyne wrote:
> The question I'm asking myself is:  how does this pan out for RDF systems 
> that treat parseType='collection' as parseType='literal'?

Poorly, as noted:

> >- parse-collection-STD raises the bar for the general
> >   RDF implementation community, who has been told
> >   that we're just working out bugs, and is not
> >   expecting us to demand more features of them.
> >
> >   (does anybody in the WG know of anybody in
> >    the general RDF implementation community
> >    who hasn't already added support for daml:collection?)

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 12:24:24 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:34 EDT