W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:37:19 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020419093551.043181d0@joy.songbird.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 05:14 PM 4/18/02 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>Right, I take your point and agree. On the other hand there is a link to 
>rdfs:range in that the datatyping constraints are applied to the object of 
>the property rather than the subject, so the 'pointed end' association is 
>similar to rdfs:range (instead of rdfs:domain). Its not a very logical 
>connection, but I bet users will find it a useful association. That is why 
>I rather liked the 'drange' or 'dcrange' idioms, which had a kind of 
>range-ish flavor but didnt actually say 'range'.
>
>How about rdfd:dtype ??  I really just want it to be more visually 
>distinct from the class name: it's too easy to make typos at present.

   rdfd:Datatype

and

   rdfd:dlexRange   or   rdfd:dlexType   or   rdfd:dlexFormat

?

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 04:56:31 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:33 EDT