W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:24:47 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101538b8e5133bef35@[65.217.30.94]>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

A snippet which gets to the root:

>
>>  To conclude that Jenny's ex:age is ten would be a mistake, an invalid
>>  inference. We should make this painfully clear to users, so they do
>>  not get their RDF in a muddle.
>
>I didn't say Jenny's ex:age was ten. I said Jennys age was ten.

Fine. But what Jenny's (real) age is, is NOTHING TO DO WITH US. We 
are giving a spec for the RDF. The RDF uses the uriref <ex:age>, so 
the meaning of that is what we are concerned with. And in the 
example, the meaning of that is that IEXT(I(<ex:age>)) contains 
<I(Jenny), "10">, not <I(Jenny), 10>. So that is what we should say 
about it, clearly and unambiguously; so that if someone wants the 
relational extension to contain something else, they can know to 
write their RDF differently.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 20:24:55 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:32 EDT