W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:24:47 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101538b8e5133bef35@[]>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

A snippet which gets to the root:

>>  To conclude that Jenny's ex:age is ten would be a mistake, an invalid
>>  inference. We should make this painfully clear to users, so they do
>>  not get their RDF in a muddle.
>I didn't say Jenny's ex:age was ten. I said Jennys age was ten.

Fine. But what Jenny's (real) age is, is NOTHING TO DO WITH US. We 
are giving a spec for the RDF. The RDF uses the uriref <ex:age>, so 
the meaning of that is what we are concerned with. And in the 
example, the meaning of that is that IEXT(I(<ex:age>)) contains 
<I(Jenny), "10">, not <I(Jenny), 10>. So that is what we should say 
about it, clearly and unambiguously; so that if someone wants the 
relational extension to contain something else, they can know to 
write their RDF differently.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 20:24:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:57 UTC