W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining.

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:20:08 +0100 (BST)
To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
cc: "RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0204171019320.29902-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Jos De_Roo wrote:

>
> > > - entailment tests and manifest files.
> > Jos, in the directory
> >
> >    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/
> >
> > there is another Manifest.rdf that describes both parser and entailment
> > tests for your conjunctive range/domain issue.
> >
> > Hopefully this provides sufficient examples to describe your other
> > entailment work; I'm writing words for all of this RSN.
>
> [wondering what RSN might mean...]
>
> you've made up a good test vocabulary Jan !!
> I'm trying to adapt our running code for that
> and for the moment it uses NT/N3 documents, so
> I have to do conversions using ARP and/or CWM
>
> for the .../rdfs-domain-and-range/Manifest.rdf
> I get some errors like
>
> [[[
>    http://jena.hpl.hp.com/arp/not/a/real/uri/[20:125]: {E201} Syntax
>    error when processing attribute rdf:resource.
>    Cannot have attribute rdf:resource in this context.
> ]]]
>
> so I've (*) added a couple of rdf:parseType="Resource" attributes
> (as well as test:NT-Document elements for the PositiveEntailmentTest)
> and that worked for ARP as well as for with CWM

Doh! - late at night. Those should be rdf:about. Fixing now.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
Don't annihilate, assimilate: MacDonalds, not missiles.
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 05:21:02 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:30 EDT