W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: charmod-uri

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:16:46 +0100
To: <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Cc: <duerst@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDMEKPCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

> > -  I18N recommend that the RDF graph use Internationalized Resource
> >    Identifiers [IRI] to identify nodes.

that then perhaps conflicts with the quoted text from IRI draft and Martin's

IRI draft:
>   b) Interpretational: URIs identify resources in various ways. IRIs
>      also indentify resources. The resource that an IRI identifies is
>      the same as the one identified by the URI obtained after
>      converting the IRI according to the procedure defined here.
>      This means that there is no need to define the association
>      between identifier and resource again on the IRI level.

> For RDF, it would just mean that when you compare,
> you may want to apply it, but you wouldn't convert and stay there;
> you would keep the original.

Unless I hear otherwise, I will interpret Martin's comments in light of the
minuted recommendation above. (i.e. also "we may *not* want to apply it").

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 13:17:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:57 UTC