Re: Denotation of datatype values

At 16:33 15/04/2002 -0400, Pat Hayes wrote:
[...]

>I don't want to be a party-pooper, but I honestly feel that having an MT 
>and sticking to it is one way to get past this kind of half-formalized 
>(and rather confusing) kind of discussion. I do not know what these 
>'levels' are supposed to be, or how to recognize them, or how to evaluate 
>talk about them, etc. etc. . Why not stick to the syntax and the MT, and 
>just talk about that? Then everything is clear. What an application wants 
>to do with an RDF graph is up to it, not up to us. All we can do is to 
>provide application writers with a gold standard for meanings, and leave 
>other 'layers' to them.

I agree.

Brian