W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:12:50 -0400
Message-Id: <p0510151cb8e0f2b1879d@[]>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Jeremy quoted M&S
>   [[[
>   Note: Schema developers may be tempted to declare the values of certain
>   properties to use a syntax corresponding to the XML Namespace qualified name
>   abbreviation. We advise against using these qualified names inside property
>   values as this may cause incompatibilities with future XML datatyping
>   mechanisms. Furthermore, those fully versed in XML 1.0 features may
>   recognize that a similar abbreviation mechanism exists in user-defined
>   entities. We also advise against relying on the use of entities as there is
>   a proposal to define a future subset of XML that does not include
>   user-defined entities.
>   ]]]
>Graham said:
>>  I also think that well-chosen entity definitions make the document _way_
>>  more readable.
>I'd note that there is no equivalent paragraph in the syntax working
>draft and I've seen RDF/XML used in this way by several people for
>abbreviations.  Do we really think this is going to clash with XML?

Are we really giving advice here, or just covering our asses?

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 17:12:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:57 UTC