W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Denotation of datatype values

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 01:19:05 +0200
To: "Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: "ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, "RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF3EF43CCA.68075346-ONC1256B99.007F01F2@agfa.be>

[...]

> Note: I've opted in this revision for rdfd:datatype rather than
> rdfd:range as the latter seems to be causing folks indigestion and I
> must admit that when taking the view that it is the datatype semantics
> which impose the constraints on the idioms (by providing valid
> interpretations of them), all rdfd:datatype is doing
> is associating a datatype context with a property, and thus
> is not really itself defining any kind of range.

we've updated http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfd-rules.n3
accordingly as well as etc http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p8e.n3
as you may see we have rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a and 5b
but there may seem something strange with 5a and 5b
the intent is to represent bNodes at the THEN side
anyhow, it seems to work (at least for that test case)

have a very nice weekend!

--
Jos
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 19:19:43 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:27 EDT