- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 11:11:32 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 18:35 05/04/2002 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote: >>On 2002-04-04 22:51, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> >>wrote: >> >>> At 06:02 PM 4/4/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >>>> RDF Schema Issues >>>> >>>> * rdfs-constraining-containers: Should it be possible to constrain >>>> the members of a container to be of a given type? >>> >>> I have a vague recollection we'd decided to defer this one?? (i.e. that >>> RDFS 1.0 would provide no such capability.) >> >>I just recieved email from an implementor, Garret Wilson at Global Mentor, >>that this is sorely needed for what they are doing. > >Then maybe they should be using DAML ? Look, RDF is a simple language. >Various people will definitely want more than RDF can provide. We cannot >insert new features just because they are needed: then we really would be >doing Web Logic, as Massimo has accused us of doing. Just so. Can DAML+OIL express this? Is it a webont requirement to be able to express it? Brian
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2002 05:14:57 UTC