W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: appeal for (short) test case review

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:43:01 +0100
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF7EA064B3.413842C6-ONC1256B92.004A654B@agfa.be>

[...]

> > The answer is a simply B/W ***yes or no***
>
>
> Yes it does, and I support the test case. Sorry about my earlier hiccup.
>
> Can I suggest a minor change that in test0001.nt one of the domains
> and one of the ranges should be assigned to the subproperty not the
> superproperty. One could even add a third domain and range for the
> subproperty.
>
> That's just to completely rule out any sort of non-monotonic defeasible
> reasoning.

I've followed your nice suggestion for test001 in that one of the
domains and one of the ranges is now assigned to the subproperty
It's updated in
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/

thanks Jeremy

--
Jos
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 08:51:18 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:22 EDT