Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT

On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Graham Klyne wrote:

> At 10:01 PM 9/28/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
> >The following are true in any rdf interpretation of the rdf vocabulary
> >(three typings and two domainings:)
> >
> >rdf:domain rdf:type rdf:Property .
> >
> >rdf:range rdf:type rdf:Property .
>
> Does this mean you are proposing to move domain and range from rdfs: to
> rdf: namespace?
>
> (This might break a lot of deployed code.  Also, they do seem rather like
> rdfs: rather than rdf: vocabulary to me.)

I'd assumed this was a mistake or typo, and mailed Pat offlist.

domain and range currently live in the RDFS namespace.

Dan

(who is finding the idea of a single namespace for all these properties
and classes more and more appealing...)