[that ``image'' reminded me about a real simple example] > Well for one thing, take the Cal Pipe animation. If I were looking for > PVC fittings, I'd find "fittings" via a search engine ("fittings" is on > the page), but "PVC" doesn't appear in the text (it's in the animation > though). So *people* can find this information out, but machines can't, > and I'd like to see RDF provide that richer kind of information. (I'm > working on a disaster recovery example application, and part of it > involves finding sources of tents (and other shelter) on the Web. A > surprising number of sources put useful information like how many people > the tent can sleep in an image, rather than in text (and, of course, > even when they put it in text you have to try to find it; in a table, > in the legend of an image, the image itself, ...). <h1>A simple example</h1> the web is about "saying anything about anything" <ul> <li>suppose that picture i was taken at position p and time t</li> <li>suppose that event e took place at location l and date d</li> <li>what kind of inferences can we draw from those facts?</li> </ul> -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ ps I would say "not a lot if we were machines" unless we precisely define schemas for GPS stuff, etc...Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 18:05:14 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:51 EDT