W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Issues list update/status?

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:04:49 +0100
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF680FCA9B.AA5F0E6A-ON41256AD4.00722F51@bayer-ag.com>

[...]
>      rdfs-domain-and-range: Should a property be allowed more than
>      one rdfs:range property? What should the semantics of multiple
>      domain and range properties be? (Dan Brickley)
>
> This is all over but the crying. I suggest the chairs
> move this to the "closed" section, with pointers to
> whatever supporting materials are relevant (i.e. decision
> record, test cases...)
>
> Oops... do we have test cases for this one? Danbri?

Although I'm not Danbri, I did make some testcases at
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/
but the feedback somewhere went into the
"RDFS entailment test" direction (which is nice BTW).

If people can live with test001 and test002 as at
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.nt
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.nt
we could proceed now (and extend as we go).

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 16:04:58 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:51 EDT