W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:46:22 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I'll also point out that we had some feedback on CC/PP which suggested to 
me that the I18N group will be looking to see these issues clarified in 
this round of RDF.  I think you're right that it's not really an option to 
ignore these issues.


At 10:40 PM 9/26/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>I also remind everyone that xml:lang is a bit of an afterthought,
>because the first WG did not consider internationalization issues until
>they rushed it under pressure from the I18N WG. I have tried to give a
>coherent account of how charmod applies to RDF Literals; I suspect it is
>better to do it now, when we can take our leisure (despite my earlier

Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 06:16:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:51 UTC