W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:42:14 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010924154047.04562df0@joy.songbird.com>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 03:19 PM 9/24/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>[2]
>Future versions of RDF may migrate to a more general mechanism for
>literal representation in which the current representation would be
>embedded. One candidate is that an RDF literal would be a pair
>of a unicode string and a URI reference. The current literals would
>be embedded within this new representation using a well-known URI
>as a base for all language tag URIs.

[...]

>[8]
>RDF makes a distinction between equality and equivalence for
>Literals. RDF Literals are equal in accordance with [2].

[...]

I'm having difficulty understanding the last sentence above, in its 
reference to [2].  Is this a typo?

..

BTW, for interest, I've submitted for publication (a revised version of) 
the language tag URN Internet draft I circulated last week.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 11:22:12 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:49 EDT