W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: RDFS rule 0

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:54:43 +0100
To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: connolly@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OFF4CA5556.9203B140-ON41256AD1.0035204E@bayer-ag.com>


Pat, I'm OK with
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20MT-rdfs-fixeddraft.html#rdfsentail
just maybe the example following the table, wit added
  foo rdf:type rdfs:Resource.
  baz rdf:type rdfs:Resource.
We now try to testcase by using http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfsrules.n3
(which is not able to express uuu (not being a literal))

--
Jos

Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 04:54:56 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: RDFS rule 0"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: A proposal for entailment tests"
Maybe in reply to: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com: "RDFS rule 0"
Next in thread: Pat Hayes: "Re: RDFS rule 0"
Reply: Pat Hayes: "Re: RDFS rule 0"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:49 EDT