Jeremy, I agree. Especially your last paragraph, hence it is possibly outside our remit to fully fix this issue. :-( #g -- At 11:23 AM 9/21/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I have no problem with that position. I just don't think it's clear from > > the XML spec (for system identifiers), the XML namespace spec (for > > namespace URIs), or the current RDF spec (for URI-valued attributes, >etc.). > >Agreed. > >The erratum >http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-2e-errata#E4 > >is the only clear statement I've seen in the specs you've menetioned that I >am aware of. > >I think charmod is fairly clear. > > >Given the lack of clarity of the current RDF spec on this issue I think we >can clarify it in accordance with charmod and allow international RI, which >the RDF/XML processor has to UTF-8-RFC 2396 escape. > >I agree wholeheartedly with your desire for a clear statement of that. > >The main problem I see is with name-spaces. Given XML namespace's silence on >the issue, maybe it means that these are already US-Ascii, which would be >ugly since we would then be mixing two different forms for the same URI. > >Jeremy ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 03:58:40 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:49 EDT