Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragment-identifiers

On Thursday, September 20, 2001, at 12:16  PM, Graham Klyne wrote:

> I find it difficult to see how we can resolve this without (a) 
> disallowing "URI-view"s in RDF, or (b) undertaking a possibly 
> rat-holing task of redefining the nature of URIs and 
> URI-references when used with RDF, which I think may be 
> stretching the charter.  However, I do think it is an important 
> issue and I am open to other ideas.

Well, not resolving the issue would place us squarely in the 
territory of (b), I would think.

Other options I can see:
  - Make some noise about deprecating URI-views in RDF and 
politely ask people to stop using them

  - (ugly kludge) Map URI-views into some other form of URI, such as:
http://www.example.org/foo#bar
   =>
http://www.w3.org/2001/ugly-
kludge/?uri=http://www.example.org/foo&view=bar

I hold out faith for other solutions...

--
       "Aaron Swartz"      |              The Semantic Web
  <mailto:me@aaronsw.com>  |  <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> |        i'm working to make it happen