Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group

Frank Manola wrote:

> I got hold of Sergey (who is trying to get out from under the hundreds
> of messages that piled up while he was away) by phone on the subclass
> cycle issue.  He said he'd be on the teleconference on Friday (so
> consider this just an interim FYI), but basically he said after thinking
> about the issue following the F2F, he didn't see that allowing cycles in
> subClassOf would make a big difference one way or the other.  He felt
> that not having the restriction against cycles was probably a more
> general way of handling them (since you could introduce
> application-specific restrictions if you wanted to), and that he
> wouldn't have a problem with removing the restriction against cycles if
> we wanted to conform with DAML on this. 


Thats great Frank.  Looks like I should schedule time at this weeks telecon.
How would you like to cast that, as a proposal?  If so do you want to
draft some words or leave it to me?

Brian