Art Barstow wrote: [...] > Since the tests are not under a publicly-readable CVS archive, > seems like the best we can do is to say that the only tests that > were approved in the Sep 12 WD are in: > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/RDF-Test-Cases-2001-09-12.zip Oops, have I been misunderstanding? I've been pointing to test cases from the issues list document. Are you saying that test cases under http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ Are not publicly readable? I can read them, so they are presumably at least member readable. > > and that any test or directory not in [1] or is different than > the same file in [1] has NOT been approved. So to tell whether a test is approved or not, I have to download the zip file? That doesn't seem very satisfactory. How about we include a status in the test case files? > > >>Art, would you like to take on the role of getting formal approval >>for test cases? >> > > Seems like this should be a chair's responsiblity (perhaps as part > of tele-conf decision). OK, as you prefer. BrianReceived on Tuesday, 18 September 2001 07:06:13 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:46 EDT