W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: question: URIs with & character

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:46:59 -0400
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010917084659.A8693@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:31:38PM +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
> 
> So far, we have been operating a policy that all test cases must
> be approved by the WG and Art's WD correctly distinguishes between
> test cases that have been approved and those that have not.
> 
> The WD currently defines approval at the level of the directory.
> We should not go adding test cases into a directory of approved
> tests unless they have been approved.
> 
> We need some mechanism to ensure that we distinguish between approved
> and unapproved test cases.
> 
> Art, would you like to suggest something here, or would you like me to?
> 
> In the meantime, lets get this test case approved.  Which I suppose
> raises another question.  

Since the tests are not under a publicly-readable CVS archive,
seems like the best we can do is to say that the only tests that
were approved in the Sep 12 WD are in:

 [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/RDF-Test-Cases-2001-09-12.zip

and that any test or directory not in [1] or is different than
the same file in [1] has NOT been approved.

> Art, would you like to take on the role of getting formal approval 
> for test cases?

Seems like this should be a chair's responsiblity (perhaps as part
of tele-conf decision).
Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 08:48:03 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:45 EDT