W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:52:49 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101002b7c7d7b86b8a@[205.160.76.200]>
To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Other than the M&S and DAML+OIL's definition of
>daml:Collection, are there other groups that have defined
>a rdf:parseType?

For what its worth, I think that DAML's use was inspired by a desire 
to follow what they perceived to be good RDF practice. DAML was 
operating under a Darpa-mandated requirement to be RDF-compatible.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Friday, 14 September 2001 11:52:48 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:43 EDT