What is the status on this one folks? Looks like a good suggestion to me. Brian Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I am happy with the test case > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/amp-in-url/test001.rdf > > but suggest it could be complemented with the attached error case, which is > bad XML. > > Jeremy > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Name: error001.rdf > error001.rdf Type: RDF (text/xml) > Encoding: 7bitReceived on Friday, 14 September 2001 09:11:02 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:43 EDT