W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:44:48 -0400
To: dehora <dehora@eircom.net>
Cc: W3C Rdfcore <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010914084448.A22328@w3.org>

Other than the M&S and DAML+OIL's definition of 
daml:Collection, are there other groups that have defined 
a rdf:parseType?  

Are there any apps that need to define a new parseType
[and are seeking advice from the W3C on how to define a 
new type]?

Received on Friday, 14 September 2001 08:45:49 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: Proposal: RDF Processor definition"
Previous message: Jeremy Carroll: "SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach"
In reply to: dehora: "2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values"
Next in thread: dehora: "RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values"
Reply: dehora: "RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values"
Reply: Pat Hayes: "Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:43 EDT