I want to confirm that the WG agrees to the test case in: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ Is there any dissent? Brian Ron Daniel wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just came across a case where I need to say something like: > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/archive.cgi?op=1&ID=1234"> > > Note the '&' character in the URI, which can't appear as > such in the RDF document. So, what do we do about '&' and '<' > characters appearing in the value of the rdf:about attribute? > (Hmmm - probably '>' as well to be safe) > > Seems like we can: > > 1) Escape as & and advise RDF applications or processors > that they will need to unescape such things. (Preferably > the RDF processor unescapes it before handing it off to > the calling application, says the guy developing applications > more than RDF parsers.) > > 2) Something else? > > BTW - This might be a good thing to throw into the test > cases. Who can do that (or show me how to?) > > RonReceived on Friday, 7 September 2001 09:13:39 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:41 EDT