RE: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43

Dave wrote:
> The WD-to-be does not add or remove anything from the infoset - it
> currently lists various patterns of infosets that match RDF/XML.  The
> next stage is to say what bits of graph they create.  At that point
> it might be an infoset=>infoset transformation if we choose to
> continue down this route.

My point is expressed by an example like

<rdf:RDF xml:lang="fr" xmlns:rdf="..." />

which does not match the production 4.2/6.1, while being a legal empty RDF
graph.

>
> We furthermore have issues with xml:lang (and literals) that have not
> yet been decided.

Fine, as a WD it's OK I think, and certainly I don't want to force
resolution of issues that we have not yet properly considered.

Jeremy