- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:43:50 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
(Another not strictly WG topic for now...)
In the 28-Aug MT draft, section 4, the class extensions ISEQ and IBAG are
required toi be disjoint. It's not clear why they need to be disjoint.
Indeed, I think this would prohibit some RDF that is arguably legitimate; e.g.
[ a rdf:Bag ; a rdf:Seq ;
rdf:_1 "member 1" ;
rdf:_2 "member 2" ]
I see nothing in RDFM&S that prohibits this, and I think the resource thus
described is clearly in the class extensions of both rdf:Bag and rdf:Seq.
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 10:25:41 UTC