W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: namedNode? in predicate position?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 12:20:34 +0100
Message-ID: <3B960A82.9C271774@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org



pat hayes wrote:
[...]
> If *that* is allowed then the M&S is totally screwed up. Is it legal
> RDF to have a property be the value of another property??

Definitely yes, e.g. rdfs:subPropertyOf

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 07:24:21 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?)"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers"
In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: namedNode? in predicate position?"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: namedNode? in predicate position?"
Reply: pat hayes: "Re: namedNode? in predicate position?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:39 EDT