W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Working on glossary

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:59:18 -0500
Message-Id: <200109041902.f84J2mg19979@theinfo.org>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> 
On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 11:50  AM, Graham Klyne wrote:

> There seems to be this disconnect between resources on the web, 
> identified by URIs (NOT URI-references), and RDF resources that 
> can be identified by a URI+fragment identifier.

First Resources can be identified by URIs, but need not be. Just 
because they don't have URIs doesn't mean that they aren't 
Resources. (That's my understanding, at least.)

> I can see how real numbers fit into the latter case, but not 
> the former.  Can you elucidate?

I don't understand that comment at all. How does adding a 
fragment identifier make the URI-ref more or less able to 
identify a real number?

--
       "Aaron Swartz"      |              The Semantic Web
  <mailto:me@aaronsw.com>  |  <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> |        i'm working to make it happen
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 14:59:19 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:39 EDT