W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 13:42:25 +0100
Message-ID: <3B937AB1.7BE7F58B@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: bdehora@interx.com
CC: "Rdfcore (E-mail)" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

Hi Bill,

Bill de hÓra wrote:
[...]
> 1: changing them to this:
> 
> 6.32 parseLiteral " rdf:parseType=\"rdf:Literal\""
> 6.33 parseResource " rdf:parseType=\"rdf:Resource\""

You seem to be proposing a change to the language.  Do you have
compelling reasons for making this change?

Brian

Received on Monday, 3 September 2001 08:46:02 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Art Barstow: "Re: namedNode? in predicate position?"
Previous message: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com: "Re: namedNode? in predicate position?"
Next in thread: dehora: "Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft"
Maybe reply: dehora: "Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:37 EDT