Re: Objections to postponing issues

Aaron Swartz wrote:
> 
> In the telecon today I said that I had objections to postponing
> the following two issues:
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
> [...]

I agree with Pat's comment that rdf:value will probably be taken care of
in datatyping (it may disapper, although I think it still may be useful
- use cases and possible interpretation are in my recent "suggestions
for datatyping" posting).

As to qname-uri-mapping, I believe it could be merged with
uri-substructure.

Sergey