Re: I18N issues proposed issues and postponement

At 13:50 01/10/22 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>In summary, I believe both issues will have some (limited) impact on syntax,
>n-triples, and (very limitedly) the model theory; and think we will be able
>to address them better later rather than now. In particular, I got the
>impression at the last telecon that a new rev of the test cases working
>draft was a possibility. I would suggest that this should *not* address i18n
>as yet. As such, the id-and-about test case
>
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-
>about/test2.rdf

I have had a look at the test file. But I have no idea what it's
testing/how it is tested. I very much would like to know.
Any pointers?

Regards,    Martin.



>should not yet be approved (sorry Aaron). (It conflicts with Francois's
>proposal concerning uri's).
>
>Jeremy