Re: datatyping discussion from jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com on 2001-10-22 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from October 2001)

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:51:32 +0100
To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OFF403CF22.2DF462AF-ON41256AED.00809E16@bayer-ag.com>

Pat,

Good to hear from you again!
I can see that

  aaa bbb "ccc".
  bbb rdfs:range ttt.

is more appealing than

  aaa bbb _:nid.
  _:nid rdf:value "ccc".
  _:nid rdf:type ttt.

but what about

  aaa bbb _:nid.
  _:nid ttt-instance "ccc".

(which would also allow to
further describe _:nid)
???

--
Jos

Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 18:51:43 UTC