W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work )

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:21:22 +0100
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <10504.1003429282@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Brian McBride said:


> Thanks for calling this out Dave.  I'd like to see a general policy that 
> proposals that change what M&S says, or the common interpretation of what it 
> says, are specifically highlighted.
> It would be easier to just say, we are not changing the current spec, but we 
> already have precedent, aboutEachPrefix, that we will change something if we 
> feel there are very strong reasons to do so.
> I haven't seen any such case made for this change.

I've no particular strong reason for making this change, rather than
just neatness or consistency and as issue owner, I want to get it
closed.  In this case it seems like even if it was not used much, we
can keep it around in the syntax without too much trouble - solving
it with better wording and specification.

Anyone who has a very good reason for a requirement to change this,
please can you give evidence, as Brian asks.

Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 14:24:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:52 UTC