W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Updated: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:32:08 +0100
Message-ID: <3BCF1218.9000208@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I had a problem with my action list earlier today.  Here is an updated agenda,
with a new item inserted at 6 to close completed actions.  Appologies for the 
duplication.

Brian


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:28:29 +0100 (BST)
From: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Oct 19 2001 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Oct 19 2001 in Europe/London
23:00:00 Fri Oct 19 2001 in Asia/Seoul

Phone: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003
irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore

1: Allocate scribe


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 26th October 2001


5: Review Minutes of previous meeting

See:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0249.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2001-09-21#3 Dan Connolly
Place rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf in proper place in directory structure (when 
we know where that is)

ACTION: 2001-09-28#3 Jos de Roos
Review test cases for cycles in subClassOf

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html

ACTION: 2001-09-28#4 Art Barstow
Review test cases for cycles in subClassOf

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html

ACTION: 2001-09-28#5 Dave Beckett
Fix test case errors

see:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.nt

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0294.html

ACTION: 2001-09-28#6 Jeremy Carroll
Re-post problem found in test case

see:
 
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0004.html

ACTION: 2001-09-28#8 Art Barstow
Delete test cases containing rdf:aboutEachPrefix

see:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf

see:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.nt

ACTION: 2001-09-28#9 Art Barstow
Investigate best W3 practice in deleting test cases such as leaving a blank file 
there so as not to break the published URI

ACTION: 2001-09-28#10 Art Barstow
Talk to Eric Miller and Dan Connolly to investigate how to use editors drafts 
and the process of updating documents

ACTION: 2001-10-12#1 Pat Hayes
Review domain and range test cases

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0274.html

ACTION: 2001-10-12#2 Art Barstow
Review domain and range test cases

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0258.html

ACTION: 2001-10-12#3 Jos deRoos
Change domain and range test cases to use example.org.

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0254.html

ACTION: 2001-10-12#4 Graham Klyne
Bring identity of anonymous resourcese back to the table for next week.

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0288.html

ACTION: 2001-10-12#5 Frank Manola
Respond to Graham

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0299.html

ACTION: 2001-10-12#6 Jos deRoos
Send interpretation properties URL to e-mail list.

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0254.html

ACTION: 2001-10-12#7 Sergey Melnik
Summarise rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes issue for next week

see:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0343.html



7: Propose approve parseType test cases

See:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/


8: Propose approve domain and range test cases 1, 2 and 3

Review status of test case 4

See:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range


9: Issue rdfms-identity-anon-resources
Propose that the WG RESOLVE that the RDF model theory draft of
25 September 2001 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/)
adequately addresses the issue
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources

See:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/


10: Propose approve test cases in 
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-identity-anon-resources/

See:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-identity-anon-resources/


11: Propose approve Pat's suggestion to distinguish between a blank node and its 
label.

In future the term *node identifier* (which may be abbreviated to nodeId)
should be used to refer label of a blank node in, for example n-triples.
A node in the graph itself should be referred to as a blank node,
which may be abbreviated to bNode.


See:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0237.html


12: Review status of Entailment tests and Test manifest proposal.


13: Review status of next Syntax WD


14: Review status of Schema WD


15: Review status and technical discussion on datatypes issue

See:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0343.html



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 13:36:52 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:05 EDT