W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:22:38 +0100
Message-ID: <3BCD5BEE.4050907@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Bill de hOra <bdehora@interx.com>
CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
DaveB,

Does your new WD propose an answer to this this question?  Does it propose and 
an answer to the general qnames as attribute values question?

Brian

Bill de hOra wrote:

> Ron:
> 
>>We should probably warn people that in the future the number of values
>>of the parseType attribute will increase, and those values will
>>probably move to QNames. However, I don't think we need to actually
>>define a bunch of QNames now.
>>
> 
> Art:
> Yes, it would probably be good to add such a warning.
> 
> 
> This has already been actioned. There's text at:
> 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0360.html>
> 
> paras 2-5.
> 
> 
> regards,
> Bill
> 
> .. 
> InterX 
> bdehora at interx.com 
> +44(0)20-8817-4039 
> www.interx.com 
> 
>  
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 06:27:28 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:05 EDT