DaveB, Does your new WD propose an answer to this this question? Does it propose and an answer to the general qnames as attribute values question? Brian Bill de hOra wrote: > Ron: > >>We should probably warn people that in the future the number of values >>of the parseType attribute will increase, and those values will >>probably move to QNames. However, I don't think we need to actually >>define a bunch of QNames now. >> > > Art: > Yes, it would probably be good to add such a warning. > > > This has already been actioned. There's text at: > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0360.html> > > paras 2-5. > > > regards, > Bill > > .. > InterX > bdehora at interx.com > +44(0)20-8817-4039 > www.interx.com > > > >Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 06:27:28 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:05 EDT