W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13))

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:29:05 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101032b7e91c3295f4@[205.160.76.193]>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>
>I disagree; I think it's important to be clear about what RDF 1.0
>is and what it isn't, and the sooner the better. Perhaps it's
>time to design RDF 1.x or RDF 2.0 that doesn't have these limitations.
>But we can't do that (inside a W3C WG) until we're done with
>RDF 1.0.

OK, fair enough. Ive been trying to serve two masters here, 
obviously. Maybe if it is just a fact that DAML+OIL doesn't in fact 
fit onto RDF, then we ought to make this vividly clear rather than 
try to fix it.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 17:29:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:40:59 EDT