W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13))

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:29:05 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101032b7e91c3295f4@[]>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>I disagree; I think it's important to be clear about what RDF 1.0
>is and what it isn't, and the sooner the better. Perhaps it's
>time to design RDF 1.x or RDF 2.0 that doesn't have these limitations.
>But we can't do that (inside a W3C WG) until we're done with
>RDF 1.0.

OK, fair enough. Ive been trying to serve two masters here, 
obviously. Maybe if it is just a fact that DAML+OIL doesn't in fact 
fit onto RDF, then we ought to make this vividly clear rather than 
try to fix it.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 17:29:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:52 UTC