- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:46:26 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 10:07 AM 10/5/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: >1 rdfs:ConstraintProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . > >2. rdfs:comment rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . > >3. rdfs:label rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . > >Currently 1. is included in the rdfs closure, but the other two are not. [...] >Anyone got any strong views on any of these one way or the other? No strong view. My weak view is that 1 should be there, and 2/3 should not. (Unless, per DanBri's suggestion, rdfs:ConstraintProperty is dropped; I do not see what useful purpose it serves.) #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 11:55:33 UTC