Re: RelaxNG non-XML vs XML Infoset [Was: Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday]

>>>Art Barstow said:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:06:59AM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> > I'm also wondering about changing the style of the refactoring
> > notation for infoset items into something a bit more SAX-like i.e.
> > open_element(attrs)....close_element().
> 
> Dave - what are you thoughts about using the RelaxNG non-XML syntax
> instead of the XML Infoset as suggested by James:
> 
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0248.html

It looks like an encouraging approach, not sure where the mapping to
triples fits in - we can discuss this.

I attach the RelaxNG schema XML version FYI

Dave