W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: RelaxNG non-XML vs XML Infoset [Was: Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday]

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 14:32:10 +0100
To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <11038.1002288730@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Art Barstow said:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:06:59AM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> > I'm also wondering about changing the style of the refactoring
> > notation for infoset items into something a bit more SAX-like i.e.
> > open_element(attrs)....close_element().
> Dave - what are you thoughts about using the RelaxNG non-XML syntax
> instead of the XML Infoset as suggested by James:
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0248.html

It looks like an encouraging approach, not sure where the mapping to
triples fits in - we can discuss this.

I attach the RelaxNG schema XML version FYI


Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 09:32:11 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:40:56 EDT