- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 08:18:41 -0400
- To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, aswartz@upclink.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:05:26PM +0100, Jan Grant wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 4, 2001, at 09:34 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > I would prefer test1.nt to only have one line if they are > > > identical. The > > > graph is a set. > > > A comment explaining the deletion would then be helpful. > > > > Whoa, whoa, whoa, I don't think we ever agreed to this. It was > > my understanding the output was a bag (there wasn't harm in > > doing so), but could be interpreted as a set. > > > > When was this changed? I also do not recall an explicit decision on this. The issue for this is: [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-of-statements and it is under the category Issues Awaiting Consideration. > The MT would give the same interpretation for equivalent arcs in a > multigraph, wouldn't it? Pat - does the MT address [1]? ~
Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 08:18:42 UTC