W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?))

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:05:26 +0100 (BST)
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0110041703250.3948-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On Thursday, October 4, 2001, at 09:34  AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> > I would prefer test1.nt to only have one line if they are
> > identical. The
> > graph is a set.
> > A comment explaining the deletion would then be helpful.
>
> Whoa, whoa, whoa, I don't think we ever agreed to this. It was
> my understanding the output was a bag (there wasn't harm in
> doing so), but could be interpreted as a set.
>
> When was this changed?

The MT would give the same interpretation for equivalent arcs in a
multigraph, wouldn't it?

jan



-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
__/\____/\_____/\____/|_____________________________________ flatline
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 12:08:30 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:40:56 EDT