Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?))

On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On Thursday, October 4, 2001, at 09:34  AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> > I would prefer test1.nt to only have one line if they are
> > identical. The
> > graph is a set.
> > A comment explaining the deletion would then be helpful.
>
> Whoa, whoa, whoa, I don't think we ever agreed to this. It was
> my understanding the output was a bag (there wasn't harm in
> doing so), but could be interpreted as a set.
>
> When was this changed?

The MT would give the same interpretation for equivalent arcs in a
multigraph, wouldn't it?

jan



-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
__/\____/\_____/\____/|_____________________________________ flatline

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 12:08:30 UTC