- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:17:19 -0500
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>This is really a comment about syntax than about MT. > >In MT, Pat says: > >"We understand linear RDF notations such as N-Triples and rdf/xml [RDF/XML] >as lexical notations for describing an RDF graph" > >which seems innocuous enough, and appears to suggest that there is a >function from RDF/XML documents to RDF graphs. > >Unfortunately, there isn't. Indeed I had thought there was, but see your point. Ive changed this to "..for specifying an RDF graph" in an attempt to weaken the suggestion of the function. Suggestions for other wording are welcome, but I don't really want to get into the messy details at that point in the MT document, though, as it would side-track the exposition too much. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 11:17:20 UTC