W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:46:22 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010927094440.03b3f640@joy.songbird.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I'll also point out that we had some feedback on CC/PP which suggested to 
me that the I18N group will be looking to see these issues clarified in 
this round of RDF.  I think you're right that it's not really an option to 
ignore these issues.

#g
--

At 10:40 PM 9/26/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>I also remind everyone that xml:lang is a bit of an afterthought,
>because the first WG did not consider internationalization issues until
>they rushed it under pressure from the I18N WG. I have tried to give a
>coherent account of how charmod applies to RDF Literals; I suspect it is
>better to do it now, when we can take our leisure (despite my earlier
>suggestions!).

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 17:19:18 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:40:56 EDT