- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:24:39 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
The URL for the disputed test is http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/ test004.rdf The crucial part being: <rdf:li rdf:ID="e4" foo:bar="foobar" /> This matches both http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part#232 "If the ID attribute is given it is the identifier of this new resource." and the contradictory http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part#214 "The value of the ID attribute, if specified, is the identifier for the resource that represents the reification of the statement." This may be in scope for the issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr If it isn't in scope, we could raise a new issue; personally I would extend the scope if necessary. The thread that DaveB and I alluded to at the teleconference was: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/thread.html#116 where Dan expressed surpise at the test. Certainly, the test has very little to do with containers. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 07:27:15 UTC