- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:26:12 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Nov 30 2001 in America/New York
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Nov 30 2001 in Europe/London
00:00:00 Sat Dec 01 2001 in Asia/Seoul
Phone: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003
irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore
1: Allocate scribe
2: Roll Call
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 07 Dec 2001
5: Review Minutes of 2001-11-16
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0561.html
6: Status of Primer
Action 2001-11-16#4 EricM Have updated copy available to group by 5PM EST Monday 19-Nov-2001
7: Status of Model Theory
2001-11-16#5 PatH Post updated copy of model theory, with datatype discussion elided, for group review by Wednesday 21-Nov-2001
8: Status of Syntax WD
9: Issue: rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty
Propose Approve test case
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty/test001.rdf
10: Manifest Proposal
Review Jans proposal.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0525.html
11: Datatypes
Action 2001-11-16#9 FrankM Clarify the architectural and other broader concerns with any datatyping scheme that must be considered.
Action 2001-11-16#10 raise compatibility issues concerning schemes S and P with the WebOnt working group.
Action 2001-11-16#11 MikeD raise compatibility issues concerning schemes S and P with the DAML+OIL joint committee.
Review Sergeys document and status of ongoing discussions.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0598.html
12: Issue #rdfms-rdf-names-use
Propose the WG
o Resolves that the use of rdf:RDF, rdf:ID, rdf:about,
rdf:resource, rdf:bagID, rdf:parseType, rdf:aboutEach and rdf:li except
as reserved names as specified in the grammar is an error.
o resolves that test case
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf
be obsoleted
o resolves that a copy of that test case be created as an error test case
o actions DaveB to create test cases for the above cases
o actions DaveB to identify any similar cases to those above and create
test cases to cover them also
Discuss use of other names in the RDF namespace with particular reference to:
(P196) The formal namespace name for the properties and classes defined
in this specification is http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#.
When an RDF processor encounters an XML element or attribute name that
is declared to be from a namespace whose name begins with the string
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" and the processor does not
recognize the semantics of that name then the processor is required
to skip (i.e., generate no tuples for) the entire XML element,
including its content, whose name is unrecognized or that has
an attribute whose name is unrecognized.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0590.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part#196
13: Issue rdfms-aboutEach
Propose
o the WG resolves to remove rdf:aboutEach from the language on the grounds
- it is not used
- it is not widely implemented
- it has confusing interactions with bagID as recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-abouteach
- it prohibits the development of streaming RDF/XML parsers
- it requires schema processing in the parser
- this is the wrong layer in which to implemenent such functionality
o Action DaveB remove from the grammar in the RDF/XML document
o Action Brian update the issues list, especially Attention Developers
14: Issue: rdfms-assertion
Discuss current status
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0568.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0324.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0560.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0558.html
15: Semantics of Reification - what progress
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2001 14:26:17 UTC