W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-11-30

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:26:12 GMT
Message-ID: <3113816.1007061984375.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-4>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Nov 30 2001 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Nov 30 2001 in Europe/London
00:00:00 Sat Dec 01 2001 in Asia/Seoul

Phone: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003
irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore

1: Allocate scribe


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 07 Dec 2001


5: Review Minutes of 2001-11-16 

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0561.html


6: Status of Primer
Action 2001-11-16#4 EricM  Have updated copy available to group by 5PM EST Monday 19-Nov-2001


7: Status of Model Theory
2001-11-16#5 PatH  Post updated copy of model theory, with datatype discussion elided, for group review by Wednesday 21-Nov-2001


8: Status of Syntax WD


9: Issue: rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty
Propose Approve test case


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty
  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty/test001.rdf


10: Manifest Proposal
Review Jans proposal.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0525.html


11: Datatypes
Action 2001-11-16#9 FrankM Clarify the architectural and other broader concerns with any datatyping scheme that must be considered.

Action 2001-11-16#10 raise compatibility issues concerning schemes S and P with the WebOnt working group.

Action 2001-11-16#11 MikeD raise compatibility issues concerning schemes S and P with the DAML+OIL joint committee.

Review Sergeys document and status of ongoing discussions.



See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0598.html


12: Issue #rdfms-rdf-names-use
Propose the WG

  o Resolves that the use of rdf:RDF, rdf:ID, rdf:about,
    rdf:resource, rdf:bagID, rdf:parseType, rdf:aboutEach and rdf:li except
    as reserved names as specified in the grammar is an error.
  o resolves that test case 
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf
    be obsoleted
  o resolves that  a copy of that test case be created as an error test case
  o actions DaveB to create test cases for the above cases
  o actions DaveB to identify any similar cases to those above and create
    test cases to cover them also

Discuss use of other names in the RDF namespace with particular reference to:
 
(P196) The formal namespace name for the properties and classes defined
in this specification is http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#.
When an RDF processor encounters an XML element or attribute name that
is declared to be from a namespace whose name begins with the string
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" and the processor does not
recognize the semantics of that name then the processor is required
to skip (i.e., generate no tuples for) the entire XML element,
including its content, whose name is unrecognized or that has
an attribute whose name is unrecognized.  


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0590.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part#196


13: Issue rdfms-aboutEach
Propose

  o  the WG resolves to remove rdf:aboutEach from the language on the grounds
    - it is not used
    - it is not widely implemented
    - it has confusing interactions with bagID as recorded in
        http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-abouteach
    - it prohibits the development of  streaming RDF/XML parsers
    - it requires schema processing in the parser
    - this is the wrong layer in which to implemenent such functionality

  o Action DaveB remove from the grammar in the RDF/XML document

  o Action Brian update the issues list, especially Attention Developers
             


14: Issue: rdfms-assertion
Discuss current status

See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0568.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0324.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0560.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0558.html


15: Semantics of Reification - what progress



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2001 14:26:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:46 EDT