- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:04:45 +0000
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Hi Dave, [...] > >Note the namespace isn't the one for the syntax: > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# >but another one: > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax Ahh - that explains something in his emails that I missed the significance of. I think he perceives the namespace quoted in para 192 as a simple error. He believes that the intent is that it should read: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# I just checked the errata and no correction is there. [...] >However, I feel we shouldn't keep Para 196 around on the grounds of >insufficient use and (correct) implementation. This the first >attempt at use I've ever seen and I don't remember seeing any parser >that implemented this. Is there a proposal covering this? Brian
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:04:32 UTC