- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 22:43:28 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com, melnik@db.stanford.edu, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > > Am I the only one to see a conflict here? (though that may > not be so surprising ;-) > > I.e. what is the interpretation of the following knowledge: > > x s:age "P12Y" . > s:age rdfs:range xsd:duration . > s:age rdfs:subPropertyOf xsd:duration . > > According to the S proposal, either range or subproperty > relations can define type. Which is it going to be? Both?! I think that in the S-idiom it is (just) x s:age [ xsd:duration "P12Y"] . and s:age rdfs:range [ is rdfs:domain of xsd:duration ] . and xsd:duration rdfs:range [ is rdfs:domain of xsd:string ] . (datatypes in the S-idiom are properties, that S-imple ;-) -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 16:48:28 UTC