W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Issue rdfms-abouteach (SWAD experience: don't need it)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:27:50 -0600
Message-ID: <3BF53E86.C39281C5@w3.org>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, eric@w3.org, "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
We've been using it for a while in our ACL system[1].
EricP in particular.

Dave checked with EricP[2], and I followed up;
he/we can live without it.

  "i use it as a shorthand in the CHACL state protocol,
  but it is programatically easier not to."


[1] An overview of the W3C Access Control System 
  Eric Prud'hommeaux
  Last modified: Sat Jun 2 14:35:01 EDT 2001 
  http://www.w3.org/2001/04/20-ACLs.html

[2] http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2001-11-16.html#T13-48-46

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 11:29:43 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:44 EDT